I have been ambivalent concerning the unborn children being slaughtered through the years; on one side I can see in a given situation it might be justified.
On the other hand it seems unfair that only one member should bear the full brunt of this action.
As I see it, there are three individuals involved in this process. Two have rights and one has none. A mama, papa, and a baby, who has been characterize as a non entity and sanitized by calling it a fetus.
To most expectant mothers it is a baby, and to call it anything else would be a misnomer. On balance I thought that the fact there are two post fetuses and one on going fetus perhaps it would be fair to kill all three. This would be a balanced approach it seems to me.
Those who slaughter pre born children belong to the “Attila the Hun” class for he had no consciousness of right and wrong, as long as it was expedient it needed no justification.
I considered the responsibility of the US Constitution and decided that it should protect the pre born children as well as the delivered children.
The Roe Vs Wade decision (in practice) says the Constitution allows you to kill them as long as they haven't popped out.
A Constitution which allows the slaughter of the innocents is a manipulative document and hardly worth supporting.
Jesus was a quite a bit harsh regarding those who would injure a little child.
Do you wonder what punishment awaits those who participate in any manner the taking of the lives of the unborn babes?
Matthew 18:6 but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it is better for him that a heavy millstone be hung around his neck, and that he be drowned in the depth of the sea.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you are having trouble making a comment - select anonymous but please add your first name to the comment.