|Then It Cooled - but Where did the Cool Come from?|
Thursday, November 19, 2015
WHERE DID THE COOL COME FROM
WE LIVE IN A WORLD OF THEROIST ALL WITH OPINIONATED EXPLANTIONS ABOUT THE ESISTENCE OF ALL THINGS
A theorist is “someone who considers given facts and comes up with a possible explanation. Theorists observe various phenomena and use reasoning to come up with practical ideas that must be proven.” Vocabulary.com
Most Theorists are college educated persons and have the same strengths and weaknesses as the rest of us who are functional yet lacking in higher education. Scientist are among the theorist crowd and are constantly looking for some solid evidence to hang their hat on.
The reason I pose the question; ‘Where did the cool come from” stems from a line of thought called; “Big Bang Theory.”
Elizabeth Howell says; “The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it talks about the universe as we know it starting with a small singularity, then inflating over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today. In the first second after the universe began, the surrounding temperature was about 10 billion degrees Fahrenheit (5.5 billion Celsius), according to NASA. The cosmos contained a vast array of fundamental particles such as neutrons, electrons and protons. These decayed or combined as the universe got cooler.” Hence the Question; “Where did the cool come from?”
Accountability is a must before theory becomes fact and to bestow eternality upon “cool” requires some basis of fact which is sorely lacking within the above stated premise.
The big bang theory requires a beginning and remains a question as to where the components of the bang come from. For scientists to answer a theory with a series of theories is not acceptable factual evidence. Be that as it may the multiplicity of theories as to how the universe and beyond found existence are lacking in factual evidence and requires ignoring that fact in order to teach it to the uninitiated.
The world of science acceptance of the Big Bang factual evidence is mendacious at best and mythical and deceptive at worst.
Another theory put forth is Creationism. It has been label by the evolutionist as being a myth. Of course Evolution is a total myth in and of itself. It ignores the fact it requires a creation in order to establish the evolving process. The time factor is a key to the evolving of the species which came from nothing. It brazenly skips over a beginning and eternalizes the universe. Without a factual thesis of the beginning evolution it is nothing more than a myth taught to the uninitiated.
As to the creationism premise it starts with an eternal being which answers to the need for a beginning. The creation was by an act of will of the eternal being and uttered into existence. It further supplies an answer to the nature and being of humanity. The emergence of man was total and complete and imaged after a spiritual creator in the heavenlies and then clothed in flesh on earth.
The evidence of Creationism fact is based upon everyday interaction with the eternal being as an ongoing experience. There is communication with the eternal being by those who have breached the gap of theory and have entered the realm of reality.